Tackett v. Duncan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that this language in Rule 4(b)(1) is Montana’s statement of general jurisdiction
• noting that this language in Rule 4(b)(1) is Montana’s statement of general jurisdiction
• examining federal constitutional law to provide additional justification as to why a tort did not accrue in Montana
• “Defendants have no connection with this state, other than the connection that [plaintiff] himself has created.”
• “[T]he mere fact that the plaintiff was detrimentally affected within Montana by the defendant’s actions outside Montana is not sufficient to establish accrual of a tort action within this state.”
• “[T]he mere fact that the plaintiff was detrimentally affected within Montana by the defendant’s actions outside Montana is not sufficient to establish accrual of a tort action within this state.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).