Tabitha Tripp v. Charles Scholz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding superior court did not err by limiting defense counsel’s closing argument
• “The court found [the impaneled juror’s] answers appropriate, candid, and credible, leaving the court confident that [the juror] could serve. The law requires nothing more.”
• “The State may rebut the motivation of the plea offers by showing that some motivating factor compelled the plea offer other than remorse or an acceptance of responsibility.”
• juror whose “opinion is unqualified or fixed” (cleaned up)
• failure to develop due process argument constitutes waiver

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).