Tabbaa v. Chertoff

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that a “crucial” aspect of Customs and Border Protection’s authority “is to ‘prevent terrorist attacks within the United States’ and ‘reduce the vulnerability of the United States to terrorism.’” (quoting 6 U.S.C. § 111(b)(1)
• explaining that “the decisive factor in the [routine border search] analysis is invasiveness of privacy”
• stating that defendants there “properly do not contest that plaintiffs possess Article III standing based upon their demand for expungement” of data collected during border searches
• discussing protected right of expression “through association at” an Islamic conference
• analyzing First Amendment challenge to targeted border searches independently of Fourth Amendment
• \Plaintiffs unquestionably had a protected right to express themselves through association at the [Reviving the Islamic Spirit] Conference.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).