Skip to main content
· 7/16/2009

Tabaka v. District of Columbia

Citations

  • 976 A.2d 173
  • 2009 D.C. App. LEXIS 255
  • 2009 WL 2044053

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a CNR is ''testimonial” within the meaning of the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment and cannot be admitted without live testimony from the official who performed the search

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Glickman, Schwelb, Farrell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.