Taal v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Credibility questions are for the factfinder; they are not for the court to resolve in dealing with contradictory evidence in a summary judgment setting.”
• \Credibility questions are for the fact finder; they are not for the court to resolve in dealing with contradictory evidence in a summary judgment setting.\
• “Credibility questions are for the fact finder; they are not for the court to resolve in dealing with contradictory evidence in a summary judgment setting.”
• “There is no reason why contradictory evidence from the same party or witness is less capable than inconsistent evidence from separate sources to create a disputed fact question.”
• “There is no reason why contradictory evidence from the same party or witness is less capable than inconsistent evidence from separate sources to create a disputed fact question.”
• if there is explanation of inconsistencies between deposition statements and affidavit, it is not within province of court to disbelieve explanation for purposes of a summary judgment motion; it is a matter for the factfinder

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).