Skip to main content
· 5/4/2004

Ta Chen Stainless Steel Pipe, Ltd. v. United States

Citations

  • 342 F. Supp. 2d 1191
  • 28 Ct. Int'l Trade 627
  • 28 C.I.T. 627
  • 26 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1660
  • 2004 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 44

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that all arguments relevant to a decision .must be presented to the agency in case briefing
  • noting exhaustion requirement ensures agency can use its expertise and develop the factual record
  • plaintiff failed to exhaust administrative remedies by not challenging denial of offset adjustment before Commerce
  • “The prescribed remedy for challenging Preliminary Results issued by [Commerce] is to file a case brief with the agency setting forth objections.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ridgway

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.