Skip to main content
· 7/6/1994

T & N Plc v. Fred S. James & Co. Of New York, Inc.

Citations

  • 29 F.3d 57
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 16808
  • 1994 WL 328542

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that under New York law, \nominal damages are always available for breach of contract.\
  • promissory note containing permanent waiver of statute of limitations, void as contrary to public policy
  • promissory note containing permanent waiver of statute of limitations, void as contrary to public policy
  • plaintiff must allege facts indicating that defendant wrongfully induced plaintiff to refrain from commencing its suit
  • “[T]he [New York] Court of Appeals . . . has declined to adopt an accrual-at-injury rule, even where breach and damages are not simultaneous.”
  • in light of GOL §17-103(1) and the Bayridge decision, standstill agreement invalid and unenforceable to extend statute of limitations for contract claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Oakes, Meskill, Altimari

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.