Skip to main content
· 12/13/2010

T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC v. City of Lawrence

Citations

  • 755 F. Supp. 2d 286
  • 51 Communications Reg. (P&F) 1343
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 132107
  • 2010 WL 5174484

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ordering an injunction allowing the construction of a cellular communications antenna after holding that the town’s denial of a variance was not supported by substantial evidence without considering the plaintiff’s claim that the denial effectively prohibited service
  • “A mere recitation of provisions of a local zoning ordinance does not constitute ‘substantial evidence’ under the Act.”
  • “mere recitation of provisions of a local zoning ordinance does not constitute ‘substantial evidence’ under the Act”
  • “A mere recitation of provisions of a local zoning ordinance does not constitute ‘substantial evidence’ under the [Telecommunications] Act.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gorton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.