T. Equipment Corp. And C.R.C. Co., Inc. v. Massachusetts Laborers' District Council

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there can be “no logical distinction” between seeking the work and seeking payment for the work
• holding that California’s contemporaneous objection rule 17 supports a procedural default
• affirming vacatur of arbitrator's award of lost wages to a union when the union threatened to stop working at the project site after the contractor assigned disputed work entirely to a competing union in violation of the collective bargaining agreement
• “Alternatively, does this position contain duties belonging in the APWU bargaining unit?”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).