T. CO METALS, LLC v. Dempsey Pipe & Supply, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that parties evinced “clear ... intent to submit the question to the arbitrator” by requesting that arbitrator amend original award
• finding that the arbitrator demonstrated a “reasonable interpretation” of existing doctrine in assessing damages and therefore did not act in manifest disregard of the law
• noting \reasonable persons often differ whether an item of damage is 'consequential' \
• vacating district court ruling confirming arbitral award on ground that an amended arbitral award superseded the original
• noting “reasonable persons often differ whether an item of damage is ‘consequential’ ”
• treating a district court’s grant of a motion to modify as granting a motion to vacate because the district court’s rationale for granting the motion to modify was based on 9 U.S.C. § 10

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).