T. C. and X. M. v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that IJ’s conclusions about “implausibility” of petitioner’s testimony about police interrogations in Georgia had to be “properly grounded in the record and, to that extent, informed by the conditions in the petitioner’s country”
• “Where the IJ rejects an applicant’s testimony, the IJ must provide a specific, cogent reason for doing so, rather than relying on speculation, conjecture, or an otherwise unsupported personal opinion.” (quotations and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).