· 1/15/1868
Szymanski v. Plassan
Citations
- 20 La. 90
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that black plaintiff stated a section 1981 claim when he alleged that “a white woman with less education and experience than [him] was selected to fill his position”
- holding that Black plaintiff stated a Title VII discrimination claim by alleging that “a white woman with less education and experience than [him] was selected to fill his position”
- determining that an African American plaintiff stated a section 1981 claim when he alleged that “a white woman with less education and experience than [him] was selected to fill his position”
- stating that § 1981 does not provide for a private right of action against a municipality, and “[i]nstead, a plaintiff must pursue any such remedy against a municipality under Section 1983.”
- noting that D.C. municipal regulations conferred various responsibilities on the Chancellor, including “the authority to take all personnel actions affecting those employees . . . under . . . her supervision and control”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Insley, Iuslev
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.