Szybist v. Aircraft Acquisition Corp. (In Re Taylorcraft Aviation Corp.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying state statute of limitations rather than Rule 60(c)(1) because the trustee sought damages but “[was] not seeking to avoid an Order approving the sale”
• while actions to avoid a sale order under grounds contemplated by Rule 60 may be subject to that rule’s one-year time limit, not all section 363(n) claims are subject to Rule 60
• while actions to avoid a sale order under grounds contemplated by Rule 60 may be subject to that rule’s one-year time limit, not all Section 363(n) claims are subject to Rule 60; rather, court applied the Pennsylvania statute for fraud’s two-year time limitation
• applying statute of limitations for Pennsylvania fraud statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).