Skip to main content
· 5/13/1907

Szok v. Crown

Citations

  • 33 Pa. Super. 612
  • 1907 Pa. Super. LEXIS 348

Syllabus

<p>Accord and satisfaction — Payment—Attorney at law.</p> <p>Where an attorney at law collects a claim for a client, and there is no dispute as to the amount collected, but the attorney arbitrarily fixes the amount of his fee, and gives a check to his client, which recites payment in full, the client may accept and use the check as payment on account, and sue for the balance which he claims that the attorney wrongfully withholds from him.</p>

Judges: Beaver, Head, Henderson, Morrison, Rice

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.