Skip to main content
· 3/3/2011

SZL, Inc. v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office

Citations

  • 254 P.3d 1180
  • 2011 Colo. App. LEXIS 320
  • 2011 WL 724831

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to address the control and direction element because the putative employer did not meet it s burden regarding the independent business element
  • refusing to consider “extensive additional issues” raised by amicus curiae “because only the issues raised by the parties are properly before us”
  • declining to address the control and direction element because the putative employer did not meet it s burden regarding the independent business element
  • claimant performed services exclusively for the putative employer as an over-the-road truck driver for a three-month period

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dailey, Jones, Lichtenstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.