Szijarto v. California

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying Ager in denying the defendants’ motion to compel disclosure of plaintiffs’ non- testifying experts absent “exceptional circumstances”
• when responding party identified documents by serial number, explained how information could be found, and offered reasonable assistance to requesting party, responding party met specificity requirement of Rule 33(d)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).