Szelega v. O'Hara

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The claim that there was a mutual or open running account between the corporation and O’Hara is also unsupported by the record, ... since there was no evidence of offsetting claims or mutual debits and credits.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Tierno v. Puglisi
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2001-01-18· cited 8×
• McCoy Associates, Inc. v. Nulux, Inc.
  E.D. New York· 2002-07-29· cited 6×
• Skiadas v. Terovolas
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1995-09-18· cited 4×
• Batavia Townhouses v. Council of Churches Housing Development Fund Company
  New York Court of Appeals· 2022-05-24

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Donahue-Halverson, Inc. v. Wissing Construction & Building Services Corp.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1983-06-16· cited 13×
• Szelega v. Farega Realty Corp.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1983-11-03· cited 7×
• In re Farega Realty Corp.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1987-07-09· cited 7×
• Evangelista v. Longo
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1961-05-31· cited 1×