Szedlock v. Tenet

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In this case, as in Fariss, equitable principles require an appropriate offset to ensure that plaintiff is only made whole and is not awarded a windfall.”
• “While a Title VII plaintiff is generally entitled to back pay ‘as a matter of course,’ the right of a plaintiff to claim back pay is limited by a claimant’s statutory duty to mitigate the employee’s damages.” (footnote omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).