· 7/9/1964
Szczotka v. Idelson
Citations
- 228 Cal. App. 2d 399
- 39 Cal. Rptr. 466
- 1964 Cal. App. LEXIS 1527
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- issue of knowledge of “infirmity” of note alleged to be void and usurious
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lillie
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.