Sytsema Ex Rel. Sytsema v. Academy School District No. 20

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that this concept is “the central pillar of the IDEA statutory structure”
• “[S]tates must provide all eligible students with a FAPE to receive federal funding under the IDEA.”
• “[S]tates must provide all eligible students with a FAPE to receive federal funding under the IDEA.”
• when assessing the sufficiency of an IEP, a district court is to \restrict its review to the draft IEP as written without considering any oral discussions that occurred between the respective parties\
• in reviewing a final administrative decision under the IDEA, federal courts apply a “modified de novo review standard,” which assumes the ALJ’s factual findings are “pri-ma facie correct” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• \The IDEA specifically defines an IEP as a written document.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).