Systronics Corp. v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the language of § 1155 “clear and unambiguous” that the revocation was “in the discretion of the Attorney General and unreviewable”
• “The language is clear and unambiguous; the Attorney General has discretion to revoke a petition at any time.”
• “The language is clear and unambiguous; the Attorney General has discretion to revoke a petition at any time.”
• “The language [of 8 U.S.C. § 1155] is clear and unambiguous; the Attorney General has discretion to revoke a petition at any time. No per se factual standards exist for the court to review.”
• “In the absence of any factual standards to discern when the Attorney General has ‘good and sufficient cause’ to revoke a petition, this Court finds that matter to be in the discretion of the Attorney General and unreviewable.”
• “The determination of ‘good and sufficient cause’ is committed to the discretion of the Attorney General because it lacks precise factual standards for this Court to review. Therefore, this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to decide the merits of this case.... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).