System Federation No. 152, Railway Employees' Department v. Pennsylvania Railroad

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting both attorney-client privilege and work product rule as reasons to deny discovery of expert opinions
• allowing discovery of “what the other party intends to prove, what opinions his opponent’s experts hold, the method by which those opinions were formulated, and the facts upon which they are based.”
• “The purpose of discovery is to permit each party to learn of the other party’s version [of the transaction or occurrence at issue].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).