Systech Financial Corp. v. Vaughn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming directed verdict where jury apparently concluded defendant started fire in his apartment because he was a smoker
• affirming directed verdict where jury apparently concluded defendant started fire in his apartment 28 because he was a smoker

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Sandburg-Schiller v. Rosello
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1983-10-28· cited 26×
• Doyle Wilson Homebuilder, Inc. v. Pickens
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1999-07-01· cited 14×
• Ralph v. Mr. Paul's Shoes, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1978-10-19· cited 10×
• Fort Worth Steel & MacHinery Co. v. Norsworthy
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1978-07-27· cited 4×
• Doyle Wilson Homebuilder, Inc. v. David Pickens, Barbara Pickens and Terry Maxwell Electric, Inc.
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1999-05-27
• Gary Pools, Inc. v. Lorena S. McCaffety F/K/A Lorena S. Strawhecker
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2000-03-23
• Centerpoint Energy Houston Electric, LLC v. Howard E. Coleman and Coleman Upholstery, Inc.
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2022-03-24
• Centerpoint Energy Houston Electric, LLC v. Howard E. Coleman and Coleman Upholstery, Inc.
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2023-07-06