Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 6/27/1991
Syno v. Syno
Citations
- 594 A.2d 307
- 406 Pa. Super. 218
- 1991 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1811
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “reiterat[ing] that an adjudicated incompetent may be ‘competent’ to testify”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sole, Popovich, Brosky
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Powell v. SymonsThird Circuit· 2012-03-30· cited 141×
- Tudor Insurance v. Township of StoweSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-07-16· cited 23×
- MURRAY BY MURRAY v. MurraySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-02-01· cited 18×
- Savage v. SavageSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-08-04· cited 16×
- Nelson v. NelsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1994-06-03· cited 15×
- Burrell Construction & Supply Co. v. StraubSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-03-31· cited 15×
- Berry, J. v. Berry, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-10-11· cited 13×
- In Re Marriage of BurgessAppellate Court of Illinois· 1998-12-22· cited 9×
- Groomes v. GautSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-05-18· cited 3×
- Koch v. HarshawSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-03-14· cited 2×
- In the Matter of the Marriage of Carlos Y. Benavides, Jr. and Leticia R. BenavidesTexas Supreme Court· 2025-04-25
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1972-04-03· cited 5,889×
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 1971-03-02· cited 3,052×
- Commonwealth v. GoldblumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-07-02· cited 103×
- Commonwealth v. AndersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-12-15· cited 84×
- Commonwealth v. GarciaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-04-28· cited 69×
- Commonwealth v. HassineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-02-08· cited 67×
- In Re Marriage of HiggasonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1973-12-05· cited 56×
- In Re Marriage of DrewsIllinois Supreme Court· 1986-12-19· cited 38×
- Harsh Investment Corp. v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court· 1987-06-22· cited 29×
- Cohn v. CohnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1941-10-30· cited 26×
- In Re the Marriage of GannonWashington Supreme Court· 1985-07-03· cited 25×
- Commonwealth v. TrudellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-02-22· cited 17×
- Roskwitalski v. ReissSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-01-11· cited 17×
- In Re JenningsNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1981-10-09· cited 15×
- Mallory v. MalloryNew York Supreme Court· 1982-05-04· cited 15×
- In Re Estate of PorterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-10-03· cited 12×
- Smith v. SmithMichigan Court of Appeals· 1983-03-02· cited 11×
- Cohen v. CohenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1977-05-27· cited 9×
- Hart Ex Rel. Hart v. HartCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1986-02-12· cited 8×
- Syno v. SynoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-12-19· cited 8×
Other cases named Syno v. Syno
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.