Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. v. Bio-Chek LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• claim that prosecutor’s closing ar- gument was improper was “waived because [the defendant] did not object to the closing argument at trial … and claims that im- proper statements were made in closing argument are not subject to review for plain error”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).