Skip to main content
· 1/28/1999

Syncsort Inc. v. Sequential Software, Inc.

Citations

  • 50 F. Supp. 2d 318
  • 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9149
  • 1999 WL 402442

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “[l]egal conclusions made in the guise of factual allegations . . . are given no presumption of truthfulness”
  • noting that establishment claims make assertions of product superiority based upon measurable tests
  • “If a complaint sufficiently alleges literal falsehood, it need not also allege the buying public was misled.”
  • “Here, [plaintiff] recited in conclusory fashion that [defendant] ‘controls the majority of the [relevant] market.’ . . . [T]his single statement of market power in the pleadings . . . is an insufficient allegation of the possession of monopoly power.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lechner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.