Skip to main content
· 10/28/1997

Syncor Intl Corp v. Shalala, Donna E.

Citations

  • 127 F.3d 90
  • 326 U.S. App. D.C. 422
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 29780
  • 1997 WL 664691

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the “crucial distinction” appears to be that “a [legislative] rule modifies or adds to a legal norm based on the agency’s own authority,” and “[t]hat authority flows from congressional delegation to promulgate [legislative] rules, to engage in supplementary lawmaking.”
  • noting that this is a tendency that the D.C. Circuit has “succumbed on 13 occasion”
  • reviewing numerous D.C. Circuit cases and noting that the D.C. Circuit has long recognized the difficult distinction between substantive and interpretive rules
  • defining the term “guidance” in the APA context as “a general statement of policy”
  • distinguishing “general statements of policy” from “interpretative rules” for § 553 purposes
  • reinterpretation advanced in FDA publication labeled a notice and referred to in its text as a policy statement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Silberman, Rogers, Tatel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.