Sylvia Mondero v. Salt River Project, a Political Subdivision of the State of Arizona

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[a]n 24 agent’s biased remarks against an employee because of his or her gender are admissible 25 to show an employer’s discriminatory animus if the agent was involved in the 26 employment decision”
• “An agent’s biased remarks against an employee because of his or her gender are admissible to show an employer’s discrimina- tory animus if the agent was involved in the employment decision.”
• “The fact that a determination from the EEOC is highly probative, however, does 9 not support [plaintiff’s] contention that an EEOC determination letter is somehow a free 10 pass through summary judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).