Sykes v. Thornton
Citations
- 152 Pa. 94
- 25 A. 174
- 1892 Pa. LEXIS 1178
Syllabus
<p>Practice — Supreme Court — Appeals from interlocutory orders.</p> <p>The Supreme Court will not consider appeals from interlocutory orders requiring sums of money to be paid to or by receivers, unless such orders .are shown to have been improvidently made.</p> <p>Receivers — Payment by — Refunding bond — Practice.</p> <p>Where an order is made requiring a receiver to pay over a sum of money in his hands in partial distribution of the fund, it is proper to require a refunding bond to be entered in double the amount of the money to be paid.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that positions available because of retirement were not realignments requiring application of the seniority principles and did not require granting a promotion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Green, Heydriok, McCollum, Mitchell, Paxson, Stereett, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.