Sydney FENTON, Appellant, v. Kenneth S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that if claimant’s characteristics do not match those in guidelines because he or she is precluded from performing full range of particular work classification, ALJ must produce VE testimony
• affirming the ALJ’s reliance on a vocational expert who testified that a claimant whose RFC was in between sedentary and light work could perform 10 percent of the light unskilled jobs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).