· 8/30/1989
Sybil Young and Roderick Young v. United States Department of Justice, Sybil Young and Roderick Young v. Chemical Bank, N.A.
Citations
- 882 F.2d 633
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that New York has only applied the tort to physician-patient relationships
- modifying judgment in suit barred by Colorado River abstention to be without prejudice
- “[The] Personal Privacy Protection Law, which applies to violations by government agencies, does not provide for monetary damages” (citing N.Y. Pub. Off. § 97-a)
- “[The] Personal Privacy Protection Law, which applies to violations by government agencies, does not provide for monetary damages” (citing N.Y. Pub. Off. § 97-a)
- “The circumstances under which the doctrine could be applied are far from clear.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Feinberg, Newman, Tenney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.