Sword v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that no showing of actual use of the card is necessary to prove financial transaction card theft under OCGA § 16-9-31 (a) (1)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Daker v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2001-03-05· cited 19×
• Mathis v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2001-03-02· cited 11×
• Roberts v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-06-28· cited 11×
• Amaechi v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2010-10-05· cited 8×
• Cox v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-04-04· cited 5×
• Patmon v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2010-03-25· cited 2×
• The State v. Garlepp
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2016-09-21· cited 1×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Blockburger v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
• Nolen v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1995-10-02· cited 26×
• Battista v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1996-10-29· cited 5×
• State v. Williams
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1994-07-29· cited 5×