SWOPE v. GREENBRIAR MALL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Et Al.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff, who was working as a public safety officer at the mall, did not qualify for the rescue doctrine when he was shot by an armed robber while trying to shield a patron because he was acting “in his capacity as a security officer” when he was shot
• describing the danger as “imminent” where the plaintiff deliberately put himself in a robber’s line of fire to act as a shield

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).