Swisher v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there is no postponement of the statute of limitation for post-conviction actions until such time as the inmate discovers the law concerning the claim
• holding that failure to address request for counsel on claims unquestionably barred by the statute of limitation was harmless error
• holding that failure to address request for counsel on claims unquestionably barred by the statute of limitation is harmless error
• holding that, because petitioner’s post-conviction claims were time-barred, the petition was frivolous and the failure to timely rule on petitioner’s motion for counsel was harmless
• holding post-conviction action frivolous due to its claims being time-barred

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).