Swinson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• eic post facto application of habitual offender act was fundamental error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Reeves v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-09-23· cited 7×
• Rankin v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-05-21· cited 6×
• Calloway v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-02-17· cited 2×
• Windom v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-12-20· cited 1×
• Smith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-02-13

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miller v. Florida
  Supreme Court· 1987-06-09· cited 1,316×
• Flowers v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1991-10-03· cited 78×
• Flowers v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-10-11· cited 58×
• Walker v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-07-13· cited 41×
• Scott v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-02-01· cited 26×
• Carter v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-12-05· cited 24×
• Lee v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1974-04-19· cited 20×
• Cabrera v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-04-02· cited 16×
• Parrish v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-12-14· cited 6×
• Green v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-12-06· cited 4×
• Wilson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-05-23· cited 3×
• Carnegie v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-07-16· cited 3×
• Ghianuly v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-10-30· cited 2×