Skip to main content
· 9/30/1994

Swink v. Cooper

Citations

  • 881 P.2d 1277
  • 77 Haw. 209
  • 1994 Haw. App. LEXIS 30

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that circuit court did not abuse its discretion in precluding expert witness from testifying about opinion not disclosed in discovery
  • holding that circuit court did not abuse its discretion in precluding expert witness from testifying about opinion not disclosed in discovery
  • noting that HRCP 26(e) is modeled on FRCP 26(e)
  • noting that HRCP 26(e) is modeled on FRCP 26(e)
  • “a trial court has wide discretion to exclude an expert witness’ testimony when a party has failed to supplement the expert’s discovery responses”
  • \a trial court has wide discretion to exclude an expert witness' testimony when a party has failed to supplement the expert's discovery responses\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burns, Heen, Watanabe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.