· 9/30/1994
Swink v. Cooper
Citations
- 881 P.2d 1277
- 77 Haw. 209
- 1994 Haw. App. LEXIS 30
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that circuit court did not abuse its discretion in precluding expert witness from testifying about opinion not disclosed in discovery
- holding that circuit court did not abuse its discretion in precluding expert witness from testifying about opinion not disclosed in discovery
- noting that HRCP 26(e) is modeled on FRCP 26(e)
- noting that HRCP 26(e) is modeled on FRCP 26(e)
- “a trial court has wide discretion to exclude an expert witness’ testimony when a party has failed to supplement the expert’s discovery responses”
- \a trial court has wide discretion to exclude an expert witness' testimony when a party has failed to supplement the expert's discovery responses\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Burns, Heen, Watanabe
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.