Swims v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding allegation that defendant advertised allegedly infringing products to customers along with cease-and-desist letter showing defendant’s knowledge of patents stated a claim
• pleadings conforming to the Forms are sufficient to state a claim even when they do not meet the Twombly standard
• denying motion to dismiss when the pleadings included advertisements that specifically touted the ability of the accused products to perform the same functions as disclosed in the patent
• “There can be no inducement or contributory infringement without an underlying act of direct infringement.”
• \It is axiomatic that '[t]here can be no inducement or contributory infringement without an underlying act of direct infringement.' \
• “Because the amended complaints actually make clear on their face that Appellees’ products do have substantial non-infringing uses, R+L has not stated a claim ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).