Skip to main content
· 2/13/2002

Swihart v. Pactiv Corp.

Citations

  • 187 F. Supp. 2d 18
  • 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3499
  • 2002 WL 272238

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • precluding plaintiff's wrongful discharge claim where “[t]he public policy against retaliation is adequately vindicated through Title VII”
  • barring -10- plaintiff's common law wrongful discharge claim because she has an adequate statutory remedy for her Title VII retaliation claim
  • barring plaintiff's common law wrongful discharge claim because she has an adequate statutory remedy for her Title VII retaliation claim
  • Because “plaintiff already ha[d] an adequate statutory remedy” for employer’s discriminatory practices under Title VII, the Court would “not recognize a separate claim for wrongful discharge in violation of public policy”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goettel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.