Skip to main content
· 7/10/1996

Swift v. Seidler (In Re Swift)

Citations

  • 198 B.R. 927
  • 10 Tex.Bankr.Ct.Rep. 262
  • 1996 Bankr. LEXIS 944
  • 29 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 552
  • 1996 WL 437444

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that attorney malpractice claim accrued based on filing of objection in subsequent bankruptcy case
  • malpractice cause of action “did not accrue until a legal injury occurred — when the debtor’s claimed exemptions drew an objection. That was ... post-petition.”
  • “a cause of action belonging to a debtor as of the bankruptcy petition’s filing becomes property of the estate”
  • “It is settled law that an agreement to release a claim held in good faith, even if the claim in fact turns out to be without merit, is sufficient consideration to support a compromise and settlement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Leif M. Clark

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.