· 7/10/1996
Swift v. Seidler (In Re Swift)
Citations
- 198 B.R. 927
- 10 Tex.Bankr.Ct.Rep. 262
- 1996 Bankr. LEXIS 944
- 29 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 552
- 1996 WL 437444
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that attorney malpractice claim accrued based on filing of objection in subsequent bankruptcy case
- malpractice cause of action “did not accrue until a legal injury occurred — when the debtor’s claimed exemptions drew an objection. That was ... post-petition.”
- “a cause of action belonging to a debtor as of the bankruptcy petition’s filing becomes property of the estate”
- “It is settled law that an agreement to release a claim held in good faith, even if the claim in fact turns out to be without merit, is sufficient consideration to support a compromise and settlement.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Leif M. Clark
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.