Swift v. Mendell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that an infer- ence is permissible where there is a logical probability that an ultimate fact will follow a stated narrative or historical fact
• “[I]f established facts can support multiple reasonable inferences, it is for the factfinder to decide which inference to draw.” (Citation and internal quotation marks omitted.)
• “[I]f established facts can support multiple reasonable inferences, it is for the factfinder to decide which inference to draw.” (Citation and internal quotation marks omitted.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).