Swift v. Luce

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• one element of a tortious-interference claim is that defendant’s actions “did indeed cause a breach” of the contract in question
• tortious interference with contract and business advantage require improper interference that either “cause[d] a breach” of contract or “caus[ed]” harm to a “business relationship or expectancy”
• “As a general rule, banks do not owe a fiduciary duty to their customers.”
• “[Plaintiff] must prove: (1) the existence of a valid business relationship or expectancy; (2) that [defendant] was aware of this relationship or expectancy; (3) that [defendant] intentionally interfered; (4) that the motive behind the interference was improper; (5
• “[Plaintiff] must prove: (1) the existence of a valid business relationship or expectancy; (2) that [defendant] was aware of this relationship or expectancy; (3) that [defendant] intentionally interfered; (4) that the motive behind the interference was improper; (5
• “[Plaintiff] must prove: (1) the existence of a valid business relationship or expectancy; (2) that [defendant] was aware of this relationship or expectancy; (3) that [defendant] intentionally interfered; (4) that the motive behind the interference was improper; (5

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).