Skip to main content
· 1/16/1975

Swift v. Esdale

Citations

  • 306 So. 2d 268
  • 293 Ala. 520
  • 1975 Ala. LEXIS 1078

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a judgment of forfeiture could be vacated pursuant to Colorado Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 60
  • affirming trial court’s discretionary decision to remit forfeiture where bondsmen retrieved defendant from out-of-state prison and returned him to custody of bailing state after he had missed court appearance
  • affirming trial court’s discretionary decision to remit forfeiture where bondsmen retrieved defendant from out-of-state prison and returned him to custody of bailing state after he had missed court appearance
  • affirming trial court’s discretionary decision to remit forfeiture where bondsmen retrieved defendant from out-of-state prison and returned him to custody of bailing state after he had missed court appearance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.