Swift v. Campbell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that district attorney general files are not subject to disclosure as a public record “as long as the criminal conviction associated with the records being sought is being collaterally attacked”
• declining to recognize a law enforcement privilege in part because the material in question was already protected by Tennessee Rule of Criminal Procedure 16
• ―The central purpose of the work product doctrine is to protect an attorney‘s preparation for trial under the adversary system.‖
• “If a timely notice of appeal is filed in a civil case, and the judgment is affirmed on appeal, the judgment becomes final upon the issuance of the appellate court’s mandate.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).