Swift County Bank v. United Farmers Elevators

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Cobb’s rationale does not apply to a party that “had no direct dealings” with the creditor
• holding that Cobb’s rationale does not apply to a party that “had no direct dealings” with the creditor
• a bank which previously had not objected to unauthorized sales of grain was “not estopped from requiring prior written authorization to sell the collateral”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).