Swift & Co. v. Licklider

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[D]ouble counting is legitimate 8 where a single act is relevant to two dimensions of the 9 Guidelines analysis.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Morse & Tyson v. Irving-Pitt Mfg. 6. Co.
  Eighth Circuit· 1927-03-12· cited 15×
• In Re Koons
  E.D. Virginia· 1998-09-25· cited 3×
• In Re Steele
  N.D. Florida· 2004-12-01
• United States v. Kilkenny
  Second Circuit· 2007-07-05

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Mitchell v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1875-02-18· cited 270×
• Anderson v. Watt
  Supreme Court· 1891-03-02· cited 200×
• Sun Printing and Publishing Assn. v. Edwards
  Supreme Court· 1904-05-16· cited 190×
• Davis v. Anderson-Tully Co.
  Eighth Circuit· 1918-09-02· cited 17×
• Hall v. Reynolds
  Eighth Circuit· 1915-05-24· cited 14×
• In re Frank
  Eighth Circuit· 1910-11-07· cited 13×
• In re Wood
  Sixth Circuit· 1918-02-12· cited 7×
• In re Miltones, Inc.
  Second Circuit· 1922-12-22· cited 7×
• Yaryan Rosin & Turpentine Co. v. Isaac
  Fifth Circuit· 1921-02-22· cited 6×
• Sauve v. M. L. More Inv. Co.
  Eighth Circuit· 1918-02-01· cited 1×
• King Lumber Co. v. National Exch. Bank of Roanoke
  Fourth Circuit· 1918-10-23· cited 1×