Swift & Co. v. Elias Farms, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing plaintiffs’ MFSAA claim in part because the alleged misrepresentation lead to the plaintiffs receiving more, not less, under the contract
• “Minnesota does follow the maxim that an ambiguous contract will be construed against the drafter, but this rule applies only as a last resort, after all other evidence fails to demonstrate the intent of the parties.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).