Skip to main content
· 3/3/1988

Swiczkowski v. Neagley (In Re Swiczkowski)

Citations

  • 84 B.R. 487
  • 1988 WL 30226

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding child support arrearages nondischargeable
  • inquiry is whether the parties’ or the state court’s objective was to create a support obligation
  • debtor’s obligation to pay indebtedness due on automobile awarded to ex-wife in divorce was nondischargeable, even though automobile had been repossessed
  • automobile would provide support to debt- or’s children and former wife; debt owed on automobile awarded to debtor’s ex-wife nondischargeable
  • well established that statements within a divorce decree which label a particular obligation as alimony or property settlement do not necessarily determine nature of obligation under federal law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Richard L. Speer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.