· 3/3/1988
Swiczkowski v. Neagley (In Re Swiczkowski)
Citations
- 84 B.R. 487
- 1988 WL 30226
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding child support arrearages nondischargeable
- inquiry is whether the parties’ or the state court’s objective was to create a support obligation
- debtor’s obligation to pay indebtedness due on automobile awarded to ex-wife in divorce was nondischargeable, even though automobile had been repossessed
- automobile would provide support to debt- or’s children and former wife; debt owed on automobile awarded to debtor’s ex-wife nondischargeable
- well established that statements within a divorce decree which label a particular obligation as alimony or property settlement do not necessarily determine nature of obligation under federal law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Richard L. Speer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.