Alaska Supreme Court· 3/31/2009
Swetzof v. Philemonoff
Citations
- 203 P.3d 471
- 2009 WL 349789
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- addressing merits of, and not controlling authority rule for, pre-election challenge under AS 29.26.110(a)(3)'s prohibition against initiatives regarding administrative matters
- addressing merits of, and not controlling authority rule for, pre-election challenge under AS 29.26.110(a)(3)'s prohibition against initiatives regarding administrative matters
- stating court has \a duty to give careful consideration to questions involving whether a constitutional or statutory limitation prohibits a particular initiative proposal on subject matter grounds.\
- stating court has \a duty to give careful consideration to questions involving whether a constitutional or statutory limitation prohibits a particular initiative proposal on subject matter grounds.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fabe, Chief Justice, Matthews, Eastaugh, Carpeneti, and Winfree, Justices
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.