Swetzof v. Philemonoff

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• addressing merits of, and not controlling authority rule for, pre-election challenge under AS 29.26.110(a)(3)'s prohibition against initiatives regarding administrative matters
• addressing merits of, and not controlling authority rule for, pre-election challenge under AS 29.26.110(a)(3)'s prohibition against initiatives regarding administrative matters
• stating court has \a duty to give careful consideration to questions involving whether a constitutional or statutory limitation prohibits a particular initiative proposal on subject matter grounds.\
• stating court has \a duty to give careful consideration to questions involving whether a constitutional or statutory limitation prohibits a particular initiative proposal on subject matter grounds.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Pebble Ltd. Partnership v. Lake & Peninsula Borough
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2011-08-17· cited 3×
• Municipality of Anchorage v. Holleman
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2014-03-28· cited 3×

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Housing Authority v. Superior Court
  California Supreme Court· 1950-06-21· cited 75×
• Brooks v. Wright
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1999-01-15· cited 42×
• Yute Air Alaska, Inc. v. McAlpine
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1985-04-19· cited 34×
• Lindelli v. Town of San Anselmo
  California Court of Appeal· 2003-09-03· cited 34×
• City of Fairbanks v. Fairbanks Convention & Visitors Bureau
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1991-10-11· cited 28×
• Hughes v. City of Lincoln
  California Court of Appeal· 1965-03-10· cited 28×
• Kodiak Island Borough v. Mahoney
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2003-06-20· cited 27×
• City of Wichita v. Kansas Taxpayers Network, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1994-05-27· cited 26×
• City of Lawrence v. McArdle
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1974-05-11· cited 25×
• Pullen v. Ulmer
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1996-08-26· cited 24×
• Town of Whitehall v. Preece
  Montana Supreme Court· 1998-03-10· cited 21×
• Whitehead v. Development Corporation
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1963-03-04· cited 19×
• City of Newport v. Gugel
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1960-10-07· cited 14×
• Convention Center Referendum Committee v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1980-09-03· cited 11×
• Low v. City of Monticello
  Utah Supreme Court· 2002-08-30· cited 11×
• Staudenmaier v. Municipality of Anchorage
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2006-07-21· cited 11×
• State ex rel. Boynton v. Charles
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1933-01-28· cited 11×
• Scott v. City of Orlando
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1965-04-02· cited 8×
• Tumpson v. Farina
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1990-04-23· cited 8×
• F. M. Vanmeter v. City of Paris
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1954-11-19· cited 6×

Other cases named Swetzof v. Philemonoff

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Swetzof v. Philemonoff
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2008-09-15· cited 1×