Swenson v. State (In re LCH)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the agency reasonably excluded the protestor from the competitive range because the protestor’s offer “materially departed from the solicitation requirements.”
• noting, in that bid protest, that the protestor’s \offer could be excluded from the competitive range because it materially departed from the solicitation requirements\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).