Swenson v. Sawoska

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• court determined it was not necessary to consider claimed error relating to damages when verdict had absolved defendants from liability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Swenson v. Sawoska
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-05-22· cited 74×
• Reichhold Chemicals, Inc. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-12-23· cited 51×
• O'Shea v. Mignone
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1998-09-29· cited 13×
• Preston v. Keith
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1990-02-13· cited 12×
• Herrera v. Madrak
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2000-06-20· cited 6×
• Saczynski v. Saczynski
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2008-07-29· cited 5×
• Swenson v. Sawoska
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-09-27· cited 1×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Milner
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-03-15· cited 83×
• Hutchinson v. Plante
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1978-04-25· cited 41×
• Day v. General Electric Credit Corp.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1988-08-23· cited 37×
• Thomas v. Katz
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1976-08-10· cited 24×
• Smith v. Czescel
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1987-11-10· cited 24×
• Bevins v. Brewer
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1958-12-02· cited 12×
• Nesbitt v. Mulligan
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1987-06-23· cited 11×
• In re Jose C.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1987-07-14· cited 11×
• Bauman & Garrity of Lakeville, Inc. v. George E. Emerson, Inc.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1988-04-26· cited 8×
• Nisbet v. Olmeda
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1988-06-21· cited 8×
• Commonwealth v. Proctor
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-12-07· cited 5×
• State v. Whitaker
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1987-11-17· cited 3×